By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Private Banks RankingPrivate Banks Ranking
Notification Show More
Latest News
Jae Bratton
Statement Balance vs. Current Balance: What’s the Difference on Your Credit Card?
Personal Finance
Citadel's Ken Griffin says the A.I. community is making a mistake by creating so much hype
Citadel’s Ken Griffin says the A.I. community is making a mistake by creating so much hype
Finance
US stocks end up as Fed, CPI loom large next week
Business
Danske Bank raises profit goal, puts Norway retail unit up for sale
Banking
CBDC ecosystem risks fragmentation, trade group says
CBDC ecosystem risks fragmentation, trade group says
Banking
Aa
  • Finance
  • Business
  • Banking
  • Investing
  • ETFs
  • Mutual Fund
  • Personal Finance
  • 2022 RANKING
Reading: Tesla not entitled to more info about race bias probe, Calif. agency says
Share
Private Banks RankingPrivate Banks Ranking
Aa
  • Finance
  • Business
  • Banking
  • Investing
  • ETFs
  • Mutual Fund
  • Personal Finance
  • 2022 RANKING
Search
  • Finance
  • Business
  • Banking
  • Investing
  • ETFs
  • Mutual Fund
  • Personal Finance
  • 2022 RANKING
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Private Banks Ranking > Blog > Business > Tesla not entitled to more info about race bias probe, Calif. agency says
Business

Tesla not entitled to more info about race bias probe, Calif. agency says

By Private Banks Ranking 3 months ago
Share
4 Min Read
SHARE

March 14 (Reuters) – A California civil rights agency suing Tesla Inc (TSLA.O) over alleged widespread race bias at its flagship assembly plant on Tuesday asked a judge to narrow the scope of his tentative ruling requiring the agency to provide more details about the probe it conducted prior to filing the lawsuit.

Lawyers from the state’s Civil Rights Department urged Judge Evelio Grillo during a court hearing in Oakland to limit a tentative ruling he issued on Monday requesting more information.

California state judges typically issue tentative rulings ahead of hearings, but can make changes to those rulings when issuing final decisions. Grillo said he would issue a final ruling in the next few days.

California law requires the civil rights department to investigate discrimination complaints by workers before suing employers. If the agency did not adequately probe certain claims against Tesla before suing, the electric carmaker could seek to have them removed from the case.

Latest Updates

View 2 more stories

The agency claims that Tesla’s Fremont, California, plant is a racially segregated workplace where Black employees have been harassed and discriminated against in job assignments, discipline and pay. Tesla has denied the allegations and said the lawsuit was politically motivated.

Sirithon Thanasombat, a lawyer for the department, told Grillo on Tuesday that courts only have the power to determine whether an investigation took place and not to inquire into the details or sufficiency of an investigation.

Tesla’s lawyer, Thomas Hill, countered that some level of detail is required to make that determination.

See also  Air Canada pilots end 10-year contract framework, eye bargaining

“Our defense with regard to at least some of the claims in this case is that no investigation was conducted at all,” Hill said.

Grillo said he was concerned that not requiring the department to provide any details could violate Tesla’s constitutional right to due process, since the company is entitled to argue that the agency failed to investigate the claims before suing.

But the judge also said that there should be some limit to the information the department must provide.

“You don’t get to inquire into the most minute details,” Grillo said. “But in between that and ‘trust us,’ there’s a big gap.”

Several other lawsuits are pending in California courts that accuse Tesla of tolerating discrimination and sexual harassment at its factories. Tesla has denied wrongdoing.

A federal judge in Oakland in April 2022 cut a jury award to a Black worker who alleged racial harassment from $137 million to $15 million. The worker rejected the reduced award and opted for a new trial on damages, which is scheduled to begin on March 27.

Reporting by Daniel Wiessner in Albany, New York, Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi, Cynthia Osterman and Aurora Ellis

: .

Daniel Wiessner

Thomson Reuters

Dan Wiessner (@danwiessner) reports on labor and employment and immigration law, including litigation and policy making. He can be reached at daniel.wiessner@thomsonreuters.com.

Source link

You Might Also Like

US stocks end up as Fed, CPI loom large next week

Court upholds Musk’s win in $13 bln lawsuit over Tesla-SolarCity deal

US tightens crackdown on crypto with lawsuits against Coinbase, Binance

Uber opens office for 1,000 more workers at Amsterdam headquarters

Morning Bid: Nervous eyes on China trade

TAGGED: agency, bias, Calif, entitled, info, probe, race, Tesla
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Share
Previous Article U.S. banking behemoths attract flood of deposits after SVB collapse -sources
Next Article SVB's failure will have a ripple effect across technology for years SVB’s failure will have a ripple effect across technology for years
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Private Banks RankingPrivate Banks Ranking
Follow US

© 2022 Private Banks Ranking- 85 Great Portland Street,W1W 7LT, London. All Rights Reserved.

  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Join Us!

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..

I have read and agree to the terms & conditions
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?